It changed its position to support the child’s claim that she had a right to be integrated. This is thought to be the first time in the country when an attorney general clearly came out in favour of the disadvantaged person in a Charter challenge.

CLAIMS UNDER HUMAN RIGHTS LEGISLATION

In addition to claims to equality under the Charter and provincial or territorial education legislation, some people have made complaints under human rights. Two factors bring education under the domain of human rights:

  1. despite conflicting legal judgements, schools have been held to be a public service or facility under human rights legislation;

  2. in all provinces and territories, mental and physical disability are prohibited grounds for discrimination. Anti-discrimination laws can address policy and practice of people and organizations within both the public and private sectors.

The basis of a complaint is that it is discriminatory to segregate children because they have a mental disability in self-contained, “special” schools or classrooms, as this denies them access to a public facility or service (the school) that is customarily available to the public it serves (children).

The first human rights complaint involving a child with a mental handicap that went to a hearing, was initiated on the basis of religious discrimination. The Catholic school board in the county of Lanark, Leeds and Grenville in Ontario required all children with mental handicaps to attend one class operated by a secular school board. This meant that Catholic children with a mental handicap could not receive instruction in a separate school in the religion of their choice. The arrangement made between the boards dictating that all “special needs” children would be educated at one site was done for administrative convenience.